So initially I was like, well, okay, I get why it would be a voiceover because it is actually a soliloquy -- UNLIKE THAT SPEECH THEY TURNED INTO A VOICEOVER IN RICHARD II >:( -- and I liked that we did see his face responding to the tavern and the street, and the common people montage happening in the context of that speech, but I was still kind of peeved about it. BUT THEN, Falstaff's Honour speech (which they put too early, but I liked it anyway) was a voiceover too, while Falstaff walked through the camp like Hal had walked through the tavern and street -- both of them actually out-of-place and where they should be at the same time -- and with the two speeches mirroring each other I was suddenly okay with both of them being voiceovers.